'A' + LEARN = FAILURE???
Purpose & Approach
This article was
extremely interesting and defiantly won my vote when it comes to getting rid of
the traditional grading system. The
author Alfie Kohn was very persuasive in his writings. He gave nine reasons as to how grading
effects students. He mainly focused on a top three and provided some good
examples. The first one was that “grades tend to reduce students’ interest in
the learning itself”. He argues that
when a student is told that they would need to know something for a test then
their focus changes. The material is then viewed as a chore and this is neither
motivating or captures the student’s interest. He stated that research has
shown that “grade orientation and learning orientation are inversely related”. The
second effect grades have is that they “tend to reduce students’ preference for
challenging tasks”. He made a very valid
point in that students are not being lazy when they chose to cut corners, but
they are being simply rational. The fact
is students are focused on getting a good grade and not on “intellectual
exploration” of their project. The third
effect was that “grades tend to reduce the quality of students’ thinking”. Alfie argues that when a student is given
numerical grades then they show significantly less creativity in their work. I
would have to agree because students who worry about their grades are also
worried about how the teacher will view their work. If the student goes outside
of the teacher’s parameters then they make get marked down to a lower
grade. I think this is why when a
student knows they are not getting an actual numeric grade, but rather
constructive feedback from the teacher then they tend to open up more and show
more creativity in their assignments. The concerns that some of the teachers have about getting rid of ‘grading’ include either the unwillingness to give up that “instrument of control”, perhaps they think grades are needed to ensure the students show up to class, or that grades motivate students to do better. Some also say that colleges demand them. Alfie argues that as long as students focus on only grades, then their learning will be affected. He states that by abolishing grades will “open up possibilities that are far more meaningful and constructive”.
Personal Connection
I could really relate to
what the author was saying in this article.
I was/am one of those students that worry about their grade. All the way
through high school I was always asking the teaching where I was at in
reference to my letter grade. I wanted to make sure I did whatever it took to
get that ‘A’. I could see how the focus on a grade can cause someone to lose
their creativity on an assignment. If
you give me a rubric or a check list for an assignment I will make sure I hit
every point in order to reach the top grade. Some teachers would even say that
if we went beyond their list then we would get marked off points. I am also am a
student whom values a teacher’s opinion and I enjoy getting constructive
feedback far more than any letter grade.
There have been many instances when I got an ‘A’ on an assignment, but I
had no idea why. There was nothing to learn from that experience. Another reason I don't like grading is I personally generally like to go above what the assignment is asking for, but I know that if I put all of the extra work into my assignment. I will get the same grade as someone who just met the minimum for that grade. The motivation is not there. I understand
the concern that if we didn’t have grades then it would cause laziness and
students to not want to do work. I think there should defiantly be a grade at
the end of the class and some accountability, but I defiantly think that
traditional grading is old school and we should encourage creativity. Conclusion
There have been many research studies that support the author’s point-of-view when it comes to how grading effects learning. Bottom line is that they both cannot exist in the same learning environment without one being ineffective. If you want a student to truly learn a topic and explore outside the parameters you set then give them the opportunity of learning without the burden of getting a letter/numerical grade. So how does this change take place? First, by having an open conversation of the pros/cons of traditional grading and make this a topic for discussion for the first year. Also the students should be able to participate in how they will be assessed for their assignment. Let them set the standards of their assignment and give up some control. Not only will this free of time of having to log grades, but also will encourage less cheating and provide a more reliable objective way of assessing what the student’s have actually learned.
Implication
This article aligns with the first NET standard ‘Creativity and
Innovation’ for student learning. The
argument from this article is that by having a non-traditional way of grading
in place will encourage more creativity and innovation in the classroom. According to this article research has shown
that learning and grading are “inversely related” meaning you can also focus on
one in order to get a positive result. APA REFERENCE:
Kohn, A. (1999, March). From Degrading to De-Grading. High
School Magazine. Retrieved March 9, 2012, from
http://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/fdtd-g.htm
Here is the link:http://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/fdtd-g.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment